Multiple Choice Questions: Treatment Options for Multiple Myeloma and Myelodysplastic Syndromes
by John R. Wingard, MD, Editor
The therapeutic prospects for multiple myeloma and the myelodysplastic
syndromes have dramatically changed over the last two decades.
The benefits of new therapies to our patients are unquestionable.
Improved disease control has resulted in better quality of life, lessened
morbidity, and in some cases fewer medical interventions and prolongation
of survival.
An irony is that the pace of discovery has outraced our ability to
sort through the various options (old and new) and order them according
to their degree of effectiveness and toxicity. Moreover, the biologic
variability of the disease states is considerable. Because treatment A is
better than treatment B for one type of myelodysplastic syndrome does
not mean it is superior in another type of myelodysplastic syndrome. A
treatment that is great for refractory anemia may not be at all optimal for
refractory anemia with excess blasts. The disease heterogeneity makes
conduct of clinical trials difficult and application of the lessons of trials
to clinical practice even more challenging.
Treatment selection is made even more difficult by individual patient
factors, especially comorbidities. For example, a frail elderly person who
struggles with ambulation due to arthritis could face severe threat from a
regimen that causes neuropathy, even though that regimen may be more
effective against multiple myeloma.
One could simplistically say that much of the dilemma one faces
with these two diseases is “To transplant or not to transplant, that is the
question.” Actually, it is much more complicated, and treatment choice
involves donor options, disease biology in a given patient, fitness of the
patient, and timing. These are many of the questions addressed in the
symposium held on February 14, 2009 at the BMT Tandem Meeting
in Tampa, Florida. Many of the nuances of the multiple choices faced
by both patients and clinicians are discussed in the proceedings of that
symposium, described in this issue.
In this issue:
Introduction
Treatment Advances for Multiple Myeloma and Mantle Cell Lymphoma: The Changing Landscape
John R. Wingard, MD
Membership Application
ASBMT News
Symposium Report:
Introduction
Optimizing Transplantation Outcomes in Multiple Myeloma
Optimizing Transplantation Outcomes in Myelodysplastic Syndromes
CME Assessment Test
CME Answer Sheet
CME Evaluation Form
Journal Watch
Download a PDF version of the full issue
|